A+ A A-

US TERRORISM BLAMED ON OTHERS

 "Syrian Girl" the Internet commentator from Syria describes what is obvious to any aware and awake thinking person, but information that the entire US Mainstream Media has spent years covering up and keeping Americans in the dark over. 

Turn off the Mainstream Media and start the process of awakening by turning to credible independent sources for news about the world you live in, you're life and that of humankind depends on it.

Read more...
Unknown Snipers and Western Backed Regime Change:
Death Squads in the Service of Western Intelligence
by Gearóid Ó Colmáin l Metro Gael
Unknown snipers played a pivotal role throughout the  so-called  “Arab Spring Revolutions”  yet, in spite of reports of their presence in the mainstream media, surprisingly little attention has been paid to  to their purpose and role.
 
The Russian investigative journalist, Nikolay Starikov, has written a book which discusses the role of unknown snipers in the destabilization of countries targeted for regime change by the United States and its allies.
 
The following article attempts to elucidate some historical examples of this technique with a view to providing a background within which to understand the current covert war on the people of Syria by death squads in the service of Western intelligence.
 

Romania, 1989

In Susanne Brandstätter’s documentary ‘Checkmate - Strategy of a Revolution’ aired on Arte television station some years ago,  Western intelligence officials revealed how  death squads were used to destabilize Romania and turn its people against the head of state Nicolai Ceaucescu.

Brandstätter’s film is a must see for anyone interested in how Western intelligence agencies, human rights groups and the corporate press collude in the systematic destruction of countries whose leadership conflicts with the interests of big capital and empire.

Former secret agent with the French secret service, the DGSE (La Direction générale de la sécurité extérieureDominique Fonvielle, spoke candidly about the role of Western intelligence operatives in destabilizing the Romanian population.
 

How do you organize a revolution? I believe the first step is to locate oppositional forces in a given country. It is sufficient to have a highly developed intelligence service in order to determine which people are credible enough to have influence at their hands to destabilize the people to the disadvantage of the ruling regime.

 
This open and rare admission of Western sponsorship of terrorism was justified on the grounds of the “greater good” brought to Romania by free-market capitalism. It was necessary, according to the strategists of Romania’s “revolution”, for some people to die.
 
Today, Romania remains one of the poorest countries in Europe. A report on Euractiv reads:
 

Most Romanians associate the last two decades with a continuous process of impoverishment and deteriorating living standards, according to Romania’s Life Quality Research Institute, quoted by the Financiarul daily.

 
The western intelligence officials interviewed in the documentary also revealed how the Western press played a central role in disinformation. For example, the victims of Western-backed snipers were photographed and presented to the world as evidence of a crazed dictator who was “killing his own people”.

To this day, there is a Museum in the back streets of Timisoara Romania which promotes the myth of the “Romanian Revolution”.  The Arte documentary was one of the rare occasions when the mainstream press revealed some of  the dark secrets of Western liberal democracy. The documentary caused a scandal when it was aired in France, with the prestigious Le Monde Diplomatique discussing the moral dilemma of the West’s support of terror in its desire to spread ‘democracy’.

Since the destruction of Libya and the ongoing cover war on Syria, Le Monde Diplomatique has stood safely on the side of political correctitude, condemning Bashar Al Assad for the crimes of the DGSE and the CIA. In its current edition, the front page article reads: Ou est la gauche? Where is the left? Certainly not in the pages of Le Monde Diplomatique!

Russia, 1993

During Boris Yeltsin’s counter-revolution in Russia in 1993, when the Russian parliament was bombed resulting in the deaths of thousands of people, Yeltsin’s counter-revolutionaries made extensive use of snipers. According to many eye witness reports, snipers were seen shooting civilians from the building opposite the US embassy in Moscow. The snipers were attributed to the Soviet government by the international media.

Venezuela, 2002

In 2002, the CIA attempted to overthrow Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, in a military coup. On the 11th of April 2002, an opposition march towards the presidential palace was organized by the US-backed Venezuelan opposition. Snipers hidden in buildings near the palace opened fire on protestors killing 18. The Venezuelan and international media claimed that Chavez was “killing his own people” thereby justifying the military coup presented as a humanitarian intervention. It was subsequently proved  the coup had been organized by the CIA but the identity of the snipers was never established.

Thailand, April 2010

On April 12th 2010, Christian Science Monitor published a detailed report of the riots in Thailand between “red-shirt” activists and the Thai government. The article headline read: ‘Thailand’s red shirt protests darken with unknown snipers, parade of coffins’.

Like their counterparts in Tunisia, Thailand’s red shirts were calling for the resignation of the Thai prime minister. While a heavy-handed response by the Thai security forces to the protestors was indicated in the report, the government’s version of events was also reported:
 

Mr. Abhisit has used solemn televised addresses to tell his story. He has blamed rogue gunmen, or “terrorists,” for the intense violence (at least 21 people died and 800 were injured) and emphasized the need for a full investigation into the killings of both soldiers and protesters. State television has broadcast repeated images of soldiers coming under fire from bullets and explosives.

 
The CSM report went on to quote Thai military officials and unnamed Western diplomats:
 

Military observers say Thai troops stumbled into a trap set by agents provocateurs with military expertise. By pinning down soldiers after dark and sparking chaotic battles with unarmed protesters, the unknown gunmen ensured heavy casualties on both sides.

Some were caught on camera and seen by reporters, including this one. Snipers targeted military ground commanders, indicating a degree of advance planning and knowledge of Army movements, say Western diplomats briefed by Thai officials. While leaders of the demonstrations have disowned the use of firearms and say their struggle is nonviolent, it is unclear whether radicals in the movement knew of the trap.

 
“You can’t claim to be a peaceful political movement and have an arsenal of weapons out the back if needed. You can’t have it both ways,” says a Western diplomat in regular contact with protest leaders.

The CSM article also explores the possibility that the snipers could be rogue elements in the Thai military, agents provocateur used to justify a crack down on democratic opposition. Thailand’s ruling elite is currently coming under pressure from a George Soros funded colour revolution hysteria called the Red Shirts.

Kyrgystan, June 2010

Ethnic violence broke out in the Central Asian republic of  Kirgystan  in June 2010. It was widely reported that unknown snipers opened fire on members of the Uzbek minority in Kyrgystan. Eurasia.net reports:
 

In many Uzbek mahallas, inhabitants offer convincing testimony of gunmen targeting their neighborhoods from vantage points. Men barricaded into the Arygali Niyazov neighborhood, for example, testified to seeing gunmen on the upper floors of a nearby medical institute hostel with a view over the district’s narrow streets. They said that during the height of the violence these gunmen were covering attackers and looters, assaulting their area with sniper fire. Men in other Uzbek neighborhoods tell similar stories.

 
Among the rumours and unconfirmed reports circulating in Kyrgyzstan after the 2010 violence were claims that water supplies to Uzbek areas were about to be  poisoned. Such rumours had also been spread against the Ceaucescu regime in Romania during the CIA- backed coup in 1989. Eurasia.net goes on to claim that:
 

Many people are convinced that they’ve seen foreign mercenaries acting as snipers. These alleged foreign combatants are distinguished by their appearance – inhabitants report seeing black snipers and tall, blonde, female snipers from the Baltic states. The idea that English snipers have been roaming the streets of Osh shooting at Uzbeks is also popular. There’ve been no independent corroborations of such sightings by foreign journalists or representatives of international organizations.

 
None of these reports have been independently investigated or corroborated. It is therefore impossible to draw any hard conclusions from these stories.

Ethnic violence against Uzbek citizens in Kyrgyzstan occurred pari pasu with a popular revolt against the US-backed regime, which many analysts have attributed to the machinations of Moscow.

The Bakiyev régime came to power in a CIA-backed people-power coup known to the world as the Tulip Revolution in 2005.

Located to the West of China and bordering Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan hosts one of America’s biggest and most important military bases in Central Asia, the Manas Air Base, which is vital for the NATO occupation of neighbouring Afghanistan.

Despite initial worries,US/Kyrgyz relations have remained good under the regime of President Roza Otunbayeva. This is not surprising as Otunbayeva had previously participated in the US-created Tulip Revolution in 2004, taking power as foreign minister.

To date no proper investigation has been conducted into the origins of the ethnic violence that spread throughout  the south of Kyryzstan in 2010, nor have the marauding gangs of unknown snipers been identified and apprehended.

Given the geo-strategic and geo-political importance of Kyrgyzstan to both the United States and Russia, and the formers track-record of using death squads to divide and weaken countries so as to maintain US domination, US involvement in the dissemination of terrorism in Kyrgyzstan cannot be ruled out. One effective way of maintaining a grip on Central Asian countries would be to exacerbate ethnic tensions.

In August 6th 2008, the Russian newspaper Kommersa`nt reported that a US arms cache had been found in a house in the Kyrgyz capital Bishkek, which was being rented by two American citizens. The US embassy claimed the arms were being used for “anti-terrorism” exercises. However, this was not confirmed by Kyrgyz authorities.

Covert US military support to terrorist groups in the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia proved to be an effective strategy in creating the conditions for “humanitarian” bombing in 1999. An effective means of  keeping the government in Bishkek firmly on America’s side would be to insist on a US and European presence in the country to help “protect” the Uzbek minority.

Military intervention similar to that in the former Yugoslavia by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe  has already been advocated by the New York Times, whose misleading article on the riots on June 24th 2010 has the headline “Kyrgyzstan asks European Security Body for Police Teams”. The article is misleading as the headline contradicts the actual report which cites a Kyrgyz official stating:
 

A government spokesman said officials had discussed an outside police presence with the O.S.C.E., but said he could not confirm that a request for a deployment had been made.

 
There is no evidence in the article of any request by the Kyrgyz government for military intervention. In fact, the article presents much evidence to the contrary. However, before the reader has a chance to read the explanation of the Kyrgyz government, the New York Timeswriter presents the now all too horribly familiar narrative of oppressed peoples begging the West to come and bomb or occupy their country:
 

Ethnic Uzbeks in the south have clamored for international intervention. Many Uzbeks said they were attacked in their neighborhoods not only by civilian mobs, but also by the Kyrgyz military and police officers.

 
Only towards the end of the article do we find out that the Kyrgyz authorities blamed the US-backed dictator for fomenting ethnic violence in the country, through the use of Islamic jihadists in Uzbekistan. This policy of using ethnic tension to create an environment of fear in order to prop up an extremely unpopular dictatorship, the policy of using Islamic Jihadism as a political tool to create what former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Bzrezinski called “ an arc of crisis”, ties in well with the history of US involvement in Central Asia from the creation of Al Qaida in Afghanistan in 1978 to the present day.

Again, the question persists, who were the “unknown snipers” terrorizing the Uzbek population, where did their weapons come from and who would benefit from ethnic conflict in Central Asia’s geopolitical hotspot?

Tunisia, January 2011

On January 16th 2011, CNN reported that ‘’armed gangs’’ were fighting Tunisian security forces.  Many of the murders committed throughout the Tunisian uprising were by “unknown snipers”. There were also videos posted on the internet showing Swedish nationals detained by Tunisian security forces. The men were clearly armed with sniper rifles. Russia Today aired the dramatic pictures.

In spite of articles by professor Michel Chossudovsky, William Engdahl and  others showing how the uprisings in North Africa were following the patterns of US backed people-power coups rather than genuinely popular revolutions, left wing parties and organizations continued to believe the version of events presented to them by Al Jazeera and the mainstream press. Had the left taken a page from old Lenin’s book they would have transposed his comments on the February/March revolution in Russia thus:
 

The  whole course of events in the January/February Revolution clearly shows that the British, French and American embassies, with their agents and “connections”,… directly organized a plot.. in conjunction with a section of the generals and army and Tunisian garrison officers, with the express object of deposing Ben Ali

 
What the left did not understand is that sometimes it is necessary for imperialism to overthrow some of its clients. A suitable successor to Ben Ali could always be found among the feudalists of the Muslim Brotherhood who now look likely to take power.

In their revolutionary sloganeering and arrogant insistence that the events in Tunisia and Egypt were “spontaneous and popular uprisings” they committed what Lenin identified as the most dangerous sins in a revolution; namely, the substitution of the abstract for the concrete. In other words, left wing groups were simply fooled by the sophistication of the Western backed “Arab Spring” events.

That is why the violence of the demonstrators and, in particular, the widespread use of snipers possibly linked to Western intelligence was the great unthought of the Tunisian uprising. The same techniques would be used in Libya a few weeks later, forcing the left to back track and modifiy its initial enthusiasm for the CIA’s “Arab Spring”.

When we are talking about the” left” here, we are referring to genuine left wing parties, that is to say, parties who supported the Great People’s Socialist Libyan Arab Jamahirya in their long and brave fight against Western imperialism, not the infantile petty bourgeois dupes who supported NATO’s Benghazi terrorists.  The blatant idiocy of such a stance should be crystal clear to anyone who understands global politics and class struggle.

Egypt, 2011

On October 20th 2011, the Telegraph newspaper published an article entitled, “Our brother died for a better Egypt”. According to theTelegraph, Mina Daniel, an anti-government activist in Cairo, had been ‘shot from an unknown sniper, wounding him fatally in the chest”

Inexplicably, the article is no longer available on the Telegraph’s website for online perusal. But a google search for ‘Egypt, unknown sniper,Telegraph’ clearly shows the above quoted explanation for Mina Daniel’s death. So, who could these “unknown snipers’’ be?

On February 6th Al Jazeera reported that Egyptian journalist, Ahmad Mahmoud, was shot by snipers as he attempted to cover clashes between Egyptian security forces and protestors. Referring to statements made by Mahmoud’s wife, Enas Abdel-Alim, the Al Jazeera article insinuates that Mahmoud may have been killed by Egyptian security forces:
 

Abdel-Alim said several eyewitnesses told her a uniformed police captain with Egypt’s notorious Central Security forces yelled at her husband to stop filming. Before Mahmoud even had a chance to react, she said, a sniper shot him.

 
While the Al Jazeera article advances the theory that the snipers were agents of the Mubarak regime, their role in the uprising still remains a mystery. Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based television stations owned by the Emir Hamid Bin Khalifa Al Thani, played a key role in provoking protests in Tunisia and Egypt before launching a campaign of unmitigated pro-NATO war propaganda and lies during the destruction of Libya.

The Qatari channel has been a central participant in the current covert war waged by NATO agencies and their clients against the Republic of Syria. Al Jazeera’s incessant disinformation against Libya and Syria resulted in the resignation of several prominent journalists such as Beirut station chief Ghassan Bin Jeddo and senior Al Jazeera executive Wadah Khanfar who was forced to resign after a Wikileaks cable revealed he was a co-operating with the Central Intelligence Agency.

Many people were killed during the US-backed colour revolution in Egypt. Although, the killings have been attributed to former US semi-client Hosni Mubarak, the involvement of Western intelligence cannot be ruled out. However, it should be pointed out that the role of unknown snipers in mass demonstrations remains complex and multi-faceted and therefore one should not jump to conclusions. For example, after the Bloody Sunday massacre (Domhnach na Fola) in Derry, Ireland 1972, where peaceful demonstrators were shot dead by the British army, British officials claimed that they had come under fire from snipers. But the 30 year long Bloody Sunday  inquiry subsequently proved this to be false.  But the question persists once more,  who were the snipers in Egypt and whose purposes did they serve?

Libya,  2011

During the destabilization of Libya, a video was aired by Al Jazeera purporting to show peaceful “pro-democracy” demonstrators being fired upon by “Gaddafi’s forces”. The video was edited to convince the viewer that anti-Gaddafi demonstrators were being murdered by the security forces. However, the unedited version of the video is available on Youtube. It clearly shows pro-Gaddafi demonstrators with Green flags being fired upon by unknown snipers. The attribution of NATO-linked crimes to the security forces of the Libyan Jamahirya was a constant feature of the brutal media war waged against the Libyan people.

Syria, 2011

The people of Syria have been beset by death squads and snipers since the outbreak of violence there in March. Hundreds of Syrian soldiers and security personnel have been murdered, tortured and mutilated by Salafist and Muslim Brotherhood militants. Yet the international media corporations continue to spread the pathetic lie that the deaths are the result of Bashar Al Assad’s dictatorship.

When I visited Syria in April of this year, I personally encountered merchants and citizens in Hama who told me they had seen armed terrorists roaming the streets of that once peaceful city, terrorizing the neighbourhood. I recall speaking to a fruit seller in the city of Hama who spoke about the horror he had witnessed that day. As he described the scenes of violence to me, my attention was arrested by a newspaper headline in English from the Washington Post shown on Syrian television: “CIA backs Syrian opposition”. The Central Intelligence Agency provides training and funding for groups who do the bidding of US imperialist interests. The history of the CIA shows that backing opposition forces means providing them with arms and finance, actions illegal under international law.

A few days later, while at a hostel in the ancient, cultured city of Aleppo, I spoke to a Syrian business man and his family. The business man ran many hotels in the city and was pro-Assad. He told me that he used to watch Al Jazeera television but now had doubts about their honesty. As we conversed, the Al Jazeera television in the background showed scenes of Syrian soldiers beating and torturing protestors. “ Now if that is true, it is simply unacceptable” he said. It is sometimes impossible to verify whether the images shown on television are true or not. Many of the crimes attributed to the Syrian army have been committed by the armed gangs, such as the dumping of mutilated bodies into the river in Hama, presented to the world as more proof of the crimes of the Assad regime.

There is a minority of innocent opponents of the Assad regime who believe everything they see and hear on Al Jazeera and the other pro-Western satellite stations. These people simply do not understand the intricacies of international politics.

But the facts on the ground show that most people in Syria support the government. Syrians have access to all internet websites and international TV channels. They can watch BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, read theNew York Times online or Le Monde before tuning into their own state media. In this respect, many Syrians are more informed about international politics than the average European or American. Most Europeans and Americans believe their own media. Few are capable of reading the Syrian press in original Arabic or watching Syrian television. The Western powers are the masters of discourse, who own the means of communication. The Arab Spring has been the most horrifying example of the wanton abuse of this power.

Disinformation is effective in sowing the seeds of doubt among those who are seduced by Western propaganda. Syrian state media has disproved hundreds of Al Jazeera lies since the beginning of this conflict.  Yet the western media has refused to even report the Syrian government’s position lest fair coverage of the other side of this story encourage a modicum of critical thought in the public mind.

Conclusion.

The use of mercenaries, death squads and snipers by Western intelligence agencies is well documented. No rational government attempting to stay in power would resort to unknown snipers to intimidate its opponents. Shooting at innocent protestors would be counterproductive in the face of unmitigated pressure from Western governments determined to install a client regime in Damascus. Shooting of unarmed protestors is only acceptable in dictatorships that enjoy the unconditional support of Western governments such as Bahrain, Honduras or Colombia.

A government which is so massively supported by the population of Syria would not sabotage its own survival by setting snipers against the protests of a small minority.

The opposition to the Syrian regime is, in fact, miniscule. Tear gas, mass arrests and other non lethal methods would be perfectly sufficient for a government wishing to control unarmed demonstrators.

Snipers are used to create terror, fear and anti-regime propaganda. They are an integral feature of Western sponsored regime change. If one were to make a serious criticism of the Syrian government over the past few months, it is that they have failed to implement effective anti-terrorism measures in the country. The Syrian people want troops on the streets and the roofs of public buildings. In the weeks and months ahead, the Syrian armed forces will probably rely more and more on their Russian military specialists to strengthen the country’s defenses as the Western crusade begun in Libya in March spreads to the Levant. There is no conclusive proof that the snipers murdering men, women and children in Syria are the agents of Western imperialism. But there is overwhelming proof that Western imperialism is attempting to destroy the Syrian state. As in Libya, they have never once mentioned the possibility of negotiations between the so-called opposition and the Syrian government. The West wants regime change and is determined to repeat the slaughter in Libya to achieve this geopolitical objective.

It now looks likely that the cradle of civilization and science will be overrun by semi-literate barbarians as the terminal decline of the West plays itself out in the deserts of the East.
 
 

Gearóid Ó Colmáin was born in Cork, Ireland, and is currently based in Paris. He is a former bilingual columnist with Metro Eireann. His interests include geopolitcs, globalisation, philosophy and the arts. He is a member of SISA, the Italian-based ecology and education syndicate.  -  Gearóid's website.

Read more...

HOW TO STAGE A FAKE 'PEOPLE POWER" REVOLUTION
by vox

 

1) FINANCE ANY TROUBLEMAKERS YOU CAN IN TARGET COUNTRY. 

Potential troublemakers that the CIA and NATO typically use to destabilize or takeover a target nation come in all forms - common thugs, exiled criminals, soccer hooligans, ambitious opposition candidates, restless students, etc. When you are the leader of a nation that the Western powers have targeted for destabilization or takeover it becomes a never-ending process of looking over one's dictatorial shoulder to see who the latest group of criminal thugs, opposition leaders or even well meaning university students seeking genuine reform are being funneled truckloads of money, communications systems and weaponry designed to assassinate you and destabilize your country and people.

Through covert CIA front operations, various NGOs and other organizations such as the National Endowment for Democracy, USAID, Freedom House, Development Alternatives Inc, and literally thousands of other Organizations, groups, and companies, the CIA funnels money, weapons and resources to any and all groups who can aid in the destabilization process. Why directly confront a target when you can confront the target indirectly, via a proxy who will gladly do it for you - for pay! In the case of the recent so called "Arab Spring Revolutions," the CIA and NATO intelligence funneled financial and logistical support to middle class and upper class university students who were targeted to be the organizational structure to gather the giant photo opportunities which are in actuality the centerpiece around which the other aspects of the insurgency are subordinate to. And Facebook pages and Twitter accounts are be the essential communications components to organizing these mass photo opportunities, such as the one in Tahrir Square which was widely broadcast in the west to show the world how much the people of Egypt were yearning for freedom. The plan worked perfectly, the students were the perfect dupes for Western Intelligence and executed their roles flawlessly - promoting the glorious "people power revolution" that the people thought was their own revolution but in actuality was merely a staged event by Western intelligence. These techniques are simple because the economies of target nations are so poor that the cost to trick these people in these countries is negligible compared to the oil revenues the West can steal from the target nation or the strategic importance of the location that the unfortunate target country resides in, that is vital to the economic interests of the imperialist aggressor.

2) BRIBE OFFICIALS IN TARGET COUNTRY SO THAT US MEDIA CAN ANNOUNCE A "HIGH LEVEL DEFECTION."

 It is a simple matter to covertly bribe key contacts in the target government to stage a high level "Defection." This defection is designed to demoralize the leader of the target country at home and also to trick dumbed down TV viewers (or anyone who gets their news from US based mainstream sources) that it is the right thing to support this takeover because, "See, even people in his own government are defecting." Since the target countries are always poor countries it is a simple matter to find disaffected persons in the target regime and promise them a huge lifestyle change by participating in a staged defection. It doesn't matter if you keep the promise, once the traitor announces the defection there is no turning back, he has no where to go so you can promise them the world and deliver nothing and there isn't a damn thing the defector can do about it at that point. What's he going to do, hold a press conference announcing that the US didn't keep their end of the bargain and give him the bribe money he was promised to betray his own country and people? When you see the word defection regarding a country that the US imperialists have targeted for takeover, you can replace it with the phrase "bribed official."

If high level officials are not available for bribery simply use any official - even a low level office clerk. Then the mainstream media will simply announce that the defector was a high level official and there will be no mainstream outlet which will dispute the validity of the claim. If absolutely no officials or persons whatsoever are willing to defect, the CIA and Mainstream media  can simply make up a fictitious person with a fictitious title and report that this person has defected. By the time the alternative media gets enough information out that in fact the whole thing was fake, there will already be another distraction in the mainstream news to keep the simple minds of US television news watchers occupied and the deception will fly under the radar. 

3) STAGE A FAKE RAPE INCIDENT.  The use of sexuality is now a leading element of all imperialist destabilization efforts to utilize in their media campaign. Rape stories are particularly effective on the dumbed down US population who has been conditioned by years of television news and government and religious propaganda to be the most sexually uptight nation on earth (besides perhaps Iran). The rape story does not have to be very well planned out and it is not necessary to even have any details of the story consistent with reality, they simply arrange (through a proxy) to have a woman shout rape - have the television news report it (and of course claim that the information is "unconfirmed" - which is now the leading way news organizations get around the obvious credibility backlash should the story fall flat on it's face as being an obvious staged phony event.) Although the bogus stories seldom fall on their face - they work every time because the American population is so dumbed down by the effect of years of television viewership that there is little left of a collective or individual critical capability. Once the rape is widely reported by the US media (at the direction of the CIA) most Americans will simply believe the story and it will become easier to trick the Americans to support yet another war that they cannot afford to pay for and which they will receive no benefits from. 

4 ARRANGE GIANT PHOTO OP. Have the mainstream American media book hotel rooms overlooking whatever popular city square in the target country that the CIA has decided will be used for the giant "revolution rally" photo opportunity to be ready to catch the action of the "revolution" when the CIA, through their unwitting proxies on the ground in the target country, gives the green light for the staged revolution to begin. At the predesignated time, the CIA will instruct their proxies on the ground to Twitter and Facebook a time and location to stage their revolution (photo op). The location will already have the presence of the US mainstream media who just so happens to have rooms overlooking the giant rally and beams these images to viewers around the world who think they are watching a real revolution and have no idea that the people in the square also have no idea what the real purpose they are there for is. 

5) HAVE ALQUEADA TERRORISTS TERRORIZE TARGET NATION. 

Bring in AlQaeda! AlQaeda was created by the CIA as a covert destabilization army from the beginning. They work for US intelligence - always have always will. This is the truth of AlQaeda. It's first major mission was the attacks of 911. Now the purpose of the CIA's AlQaeda is to destabilize target nations. When the target nation defends itself against the CIA's AlQaeda paid terrorists like any honorable nation or leader would do when the CIA brings them in to do their work, the mainstream media will report, "Oh look at this evil leader of target nation, how dare he fire on his own people." Regardless of the mountain of credible evidence and reports from independent media that in fact the target government is not firing on it's own people but instead defending itself against an outside force brought in by the CIA to destabilize the nation, the mainstream media can be counted on to keep the American people in the dark and dumbed down. Instead of using common sense the American population can be counted upon to wave the flag and shout kill rather than actually think anything trough and see the naked lie for what it is.

6) SEND IN THE DEATH SQUADS. (Snipers, Snipers, Snipers)

CIA death squads have been a major component in US destabilization programs since they unleashed wide scale terrorism throughout Latin America and Central America in the 1980's and before. Like all of the dirty work of US imperialism these days, the death squads wouldn't be comprised of actual CIA agents, but paid proxy terrorists. It's not hard to find criminal or terrorist elements throughout the world willing and ready to perform terrorist acts for pay - and pay is what the US does. Throughout the world, the US government is paying (through intermediate proxies) billions of dollars to any thug, criminal, or terrorist willing to terrorize their own people.

In all the Arab Spring uprisings we see examples of snipers from rooftops randomly killing innocent women and children so that their partners in the US mainstream media can report these killings as the handiwork of the target regime when it is obvious on a surface examination of the facts that the snipers are working for Western intelligence and not the target regime. It matters little that large percentages of the target population closest to the conflict themselves (the citizens of the targeted nation) do not believe that their own government is shooting on them and are openly accusing the CIA of being behind the sniping and death squads - the media will simply ignore the people of the target country and instead set up an informant working for US intelligence as a "man in the street" spokesman representing the views and opinions of the entire population of the target nation. This paid informant will claim that it is the target regime shooting their own people - and this will work smoothly on the dumbed down minds of the average US television news viewer who do not have the time and ability to understand the complex dynamics of such events or verify any facts further than what they are being presented by the US media. And so CIA death squads are and will unfortunately be a major element of US imperialist destabilization programs. 

7) NO FLY ZONE. 

The CIA and mainstream media arrange informants in target nation for a "man in the street" report where these unnamed and unknown persons inject the "No Fly Zone" meme into the media campaign. The media provides extensive coverage of these bogus set up "man in the street" reports. We saw this technique of the no fly zone in the first Iraq conflict and quickly after in the Bosnia Herzegovina conflict. But the idea to use it, not as a method to provide humanitarian relief but as a tool of imperialist conquest, was obvious to astute political observers in the CIA's staged "Arab Spring Revolution" in Libya. 

The first mentions of the idea of applying the no fly zone was placed in the flow of televised news by CNN when in a report from Libya, CNN producers in cooperation with Western intelligence staged a fake news report where an unidentified "man in the street" began the call for a no fly zone. It had been many years since the Bosnia conflict and it is extremely unlikely that an average "man in the street" in Libya would have ever even heard of the concept of a no fly zone or would have thought that during a chance encounter in the street with a CNN reporter he would suddenly think to tell the CNN reporter that the US should institute a no fly zone.

As soon as that very first injection of the no fly zone meme was staged by CNN under the direction of the CIA, Voxnews immediately issued reports warning that it would soon be an all out carpet bombing of Libya. The story was fake but like most of the news coming from Western mainstream media and their CIA handlers, it worked. As soon as the staged no fly zone meme was injected into the news stream you saw within hours that every news network was transmitting these false claims that all of the sudden hundreds of unidentified random citizens in target country and now identified public officials in target country were all calling for a no fly zone. The CIA and state department then assess who could be a willing accomplice in the imperialist aggression and lucky for the Obama administration they had a more than willing fascist President of France, Sarkozy, who was eager to cover up his criminal acceptance of hundred of millions of dollars from the regime of Gaddafi in order to steal the French election and drive the entire country of France into a fascist regime. So Sarkozy had to cover up his criminality in accepting all of this bribe money from the Libyan leader and the state department knew full well that the Criminal Sarkozy would be a willing accomplice in the murder of Gaddafi to cover up Sarkozy's crimes. So that little Fascist prick joined in quite heartily.

Saudi Arabia, Quatar and the corrupt emirates under the umbrella of Western Intelligence eagerly joined in the murder spree that was to ensue. NATO nations who resisted the US's criminal adventure in Libya were strong-armed into cooperating and a few NATO nations reluctantly caved into the threats and strong-arm tactics of the criminal US administration and halfheartedly joined in on the bombing and killing spree. 

Once the oligarchy's United Nations approves the no fly zone - it quickly becomes a losing situation for the target nation and target people - Once NATO commences the flyovers they don't simply prevent target nations planes from flying, instead they begin bombardment of target country's water supply, communication systems, bridges, hospitals, elementary schools, wedding parties, etc etc. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians get killed but the US media and their CIA handlers will of course refuse to report on or show images of the civilian deaths. (because that would be in poor taste they say)  

When it is no longer possible for the US mainstream media to ignore the massive casualties inflicted on innocent women and children (due to the unavoidable reality that streams of images of the civilian children with their bodies blown to pieces are being reported by non US based news networks and of course on the Internet) then and only then when the CIA can no longer keep the American people in the dark, their TV news networks will slip in a report here and there suggesting that there may be a few civilian casualties. And these reports typically will occur at 2 or 3 in the morning when no one is watching. 

In other words when you see the words NO FLY ZONE you can replace it with NATO BOMBARDMENT OF TARGET COUNTRY'S COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE. This is a perfect strategy for the Military contractors who plan on reaping dizzying fortunes cashing in on the lucrative "rebuilding contracts" that they always factor into their typical profiteering schemes that accompany all destabilization and takeover scams.

8) THE DREADED 'HUMANITARIAN AID" 

When you hear the phrase "Humanitarian Aid" you can replace it with the phrase "Terrorist attacks and illegal weapons smuggling into target nation" The term, "US humanitarian aid," is now a euphemism for covert CIA terrorist takeovers. In other words when the US starts calling to send in humanitarian aid to your oil rich or strategically located country - HEAD FOR THE HILLS (or better yet head for the bunkers). Because the humanitarian aid is just the cover operation, the real purpose of US humanitarian aid missions is to kill people not help them. The purpose of humanitarian aid is to place covert terrorist insurgents on the ground in the target country and to place CIA agents on the ground to direct them. Under the cover of humanitarian aid, the weapons, death machines, communications equipment, technology and Intelligence personnel are all smuggled in and utilized in the destabilization or takeover. 

9) UNITED NATIONS. The United Nations is a puppet organization of the ruling oligarchic class. It is a tool of the established oligarchy whose purpose is to consolidate the worlds resources into the hands of this power. 

10) GRAINY BLURRY CELL PHONE "UNVERIFIED" ACTION VIDEO. 

People who get their information from the television have a taste for something they can see with their own eyes - it matters little to them if that thing they are seeing is completely a fictitious staged news story, they cannot tell the difference. Blurry grainy video fits this requirement perfectly. We live in the age of the death of proof. We know this because 911 was already proven beyond a shadow of doubt to be perpetrated by a shadowy rogue intelligence network yet when this proof is shown to people who believe in the TV version of international events, it has almost no effect. 

In other words people believe what they are told to believe by whatever authority figure owns the networks where the people get their news. Grainy, blurry video is sufficient for people who have had their critical capability blunted by years television viewership. When the CIA produced all the many fake Bin Ladin videos, the actors playing bin laden were so bad that unless the footage was extremely grainy and blurry, it would be much more simple for researchers to demonstrate the fakery in them. By blurring the video or using an old outdated poor quality camera there are much fewer details available to see the deception. 

Since video cameras are so advanced these days it is becoming much more difficult to get poor quality cameras in the hands of the people who produce these grainy videos so there are many software tools available to blur and obfuscate details from the high quality video produced by most cameras today, so that the fakery is much more difficult to detect. 

Ask yourself this, If Osama Bin Ladin was such a millionaire why then would all the cameras he used to present his views to the world be of such poor quality that you can barely make out the details of the images? Why always blurry and grainy?  This is because they are fake productions - It's not like high quality video cameras aren't available for purchase in every major city of the world - it's that the images MUST be grainy or else the deception can be detected.

11) CLAIM VICTORY. Whether or not actual victory has been achieved, claim it anyways. The idea here is that if you claim victory enough times, more and more people will be tricked into thinking they have been beaten and this might hasten their resignation to accept the new order imposed by the covert US aggressor. 

12) BLOCK ALL COMMUNICATIONS FROM TARGET NATION. Isolate target nation and cut off all outgoing communications so that the target nation cannot get their side of the story out. We see that the US routinely kills the satillite stations of target nation so that their voice cannot be heard. 

13) FAKE "MAN IN THE STREET" COMMENTARY. This is cheap, easy and extremely cost effective. It doesn't matter if the person is a criminal, paid informer or an agent - Americans are easily tricked and will have no idea that the commentary is really staged for the camera.

14) HAVE AN ANONYMOUS INTERNET FIGURE who's identity cannot be verified and appears to be within the country and put out very populist propaganda against target regime that seemingly is coming from, "the people," but in actuality originates in Chantilly Virginia or Langly Virginia (NSA and CIA) and originates from the many "public relations firms" such as Hill and Knowlton and Berson Marstellar who are paid subcontractors of the US CIA for the purpose of creating bogus news stories and bogus psychological operations to trick Americans who get their information from the TV and other mainstream sources. 

 15) ORGANIZE TRANSITIONAL COUNCIL

Quickly create what appears to be an thoroughly organized alternative government who is ready to take over the reigns of government when the CIA's people power revolution gets the green light and the dominos start falling. When the time is right, usually early on, announce the formation of this new government. Even go so far as to demonstrate fraudulent details such as the Benghazi rebel government long before the fall of Gaddafi, we see reports of the transitional government which has it all "so together" that they have announced that they are beginning garbage removal in their war torn capital - in lieu of their horrible regime who is too busy terrorizing their own civilians (who in fact are merely defending themselves against AlQaeda mercenaries brought in by the CIA to create terror) to pick up the rebel's garbage. This ridiculous scenario can only be accepted by a population who have already had the prerequisite critical capabilities decimated) This fraudulent story was given high marks by the clandestine services and will now be considered standard procedure to include such details in the media and military takeover, absorption or destruction of target countries. The story was entirely scripted and came off superbly - to trick unsuspecting television viewers into the hopes that the war they are supporting is going well and not in fact what it is, which is a situation with paid AlQaeda Mercenaries being shipped into the country to create chaos and randomly assassinate people to be blamed on the government, eventually leading to the destabilization of the government and it's absorption into the sphere of western imperialist influence. 

16 BANNERS BANNERS BANNERS. 

We now see the ubiquitous large scale instantly printed backdrops for the many staged and thoroughly phony press conferences. You know the ones that say things like "Mission Accomplished" and like the massive backdrops for the giant PR photo opportunities set up by the intelligence agencies for the various "rebel groups" covertly supported by the CIA via multiple proxies to avoid detection of the western fueled coup efforts. We saw the massive staged "Friends of Syria" farce complete with table dressing and large printed backdrops saying "Friends of Syria." Throw in a lot of uplifting words like, "towards a new future" or "change for a better tomorrow." It's important to use quality backdrops, and lighting and top notch production values for these staged conferences. It's all about production values for the media counterpart of the takeover effort of the target country. 

It's like taking candy from a baby, but in the process millions of innocent people throughout the world are either snuffed out or have their limbs blows off so that the US oligarchy can keep their grip on power. 

 

Know your Enemy

vox

Read more...

US Sponsored Terrorism (more)

Radical Islam is Like a Wind Up Doll

Radical Islam is Like a Wind Up Doll

Investigative journalist Harry Stuckey on RT news explains that radical Islamic terrorism is like a ... Read more

Vox on ISIS, Russia, and the State of the American Political Mindset

Vox on ISIS, Russia, and the State of the American Political Mindset

It's not looking good for America right now. The right are beating their war drums against anyone an... Read more

ISIS - Made in USA

ISIS - Made in USA

{youtube}Qmrjc36FHvo{/youtube} US efforts to kill the last remaining secular leaders in the Middle ... Read more

ISIS: Made in the USA

ISIS: Made in the USA

On Sunday May 31st at City University of New York - John Jay College - 3:40pm Room 1.105Voxnews is... Read more

EBOLA CIA CONNECTION

EBOLA CIA CONNECTION

In this explosive interview, Vox uncovers the chilling reality that the Ebola outbreak is a western ... Read more

Vox on ISIS

Vox on ISIS

Vox analyses & unravels the origins and purpose of ISIS as the latest covert monster that Wester... Read more

AlQaeda Commander Fingers ISIS as US Proxy Army

AlQaeda Commander Fingers ISIS as US Proxy Army

{youtube}NEuJ5v3AbJg{/youtube} In this breathtaking interview, original Al Qaeda fighter Sheikh Nab... Read more

Police State USA

Police Kill More Citizens In 1 Year - Th…

Police Kill More Citizens In 1 Year - Than All Mass Shooters Combined

With each new sensational mass murder (most of which are performed by persons on powerful government... Read more

Martin Luther King... Confederate Genera…

Martin Luther King... Confederate General or Astronaut?

The chilling dumbing down of the American population is complete, the ruling class now has a complet... Read more

US Government Infiltrated Most "Sec…

US Government Infiltrated Most "Security" Software

The US. Government Funded Your Favorite ‘NSA-proof’ Software. The Snowden revelations about the NSA... Read more

Anonymous

Anonymous

Voxnews applauds the courage and efforts of the Anonymous movement.  Dispensing with the non existe... Read more

Million Mask March - Washington

Million Mask March - Washington

We marched on the enemy in Washington. Coverage of the anonymous masked march through the source of ... Read more

PRIVATE US COVERT GROUPS BEHIND SCHOOL S…

PRIVATE US COVERT GROUPS BEHIND SCHOOL SHOOTINGS

The dark hand of the private, ultra right wing, clandestine intelligence operatives will continue to... Read more

copyright 2012 vox information sciences

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel